Read, apply, check
Prompt examples and evidence-checking guides
Supply the real context, keep sources and assumptions visible, and review whether the output completes the intended task.
Choose the task that fits what you are trying to understand. Each resource includes an explanation, practical examples and references. For an exercise sheet, try the questions before opening the solutions.
Supply report scope, stable query IDs and actual page coverage, then ask for a task table and one brief. Preserve observed metrics and missing evidence. The original prompt pack and six-row fictional example show when to update a page, investigate a gap or keep uncertainty open.
Shared queries identify candidates, not a confirmed cannibalization problem. Use actual query-page mappings, compatible report scopes and reviewed page purposes before judging overlap. An original copyable prompt, eight fictional paired rows, a deliberate scope mismatch and six cases show how to preserve evidence, check false positives and leave harm unproven when the data does not establish it.
Use the approved brief as a set of traceable requirements. This original acceptance prompt asks for exact draft evidence, distinguishes visible failures from unavailable verification, and prevents a polished draft or a numerical score from hiding a required gap. Two fictional versions, a checked eight-criterion review and six cases show what can pass, what needs revision and what remains unknown.
Match exact draft claims to available cited passages, preserve source identity and scope, and separate five evidence results. Includes a copyable prompt, a complete fictional source pack, seven checked rows and a blank audit record.
Preserve exact destinations, source passages and reader reasons. Includes an observed three-URL example, a copyable prompt, a local record checker and six explained decisions.
Keep exact rows, provisional tasks and alternative meanings visible. Use the original prompt, ten-row example and local bookkeeping checker before reviewing evidence and existing page purpose.
Freeze the source version, list its facts and conditions, then rewrite only the allowed wording. Check every required fact against the new copy and every new factual statement against the source. A clearer sentence is useful only if it preserves the same permission, limit, condition and uncertainty.
Keep both passages, compare their scopes and apply only an explicit supplied precedence rule. A later date alone does not establish authority. Resolve only the fields an approved amendment names; carry unresolved conflicts into the handoff with a precise question and required evidence.
Return to ChatGPT Prompts Hub
Build a content brief or a research-paper plan
Use a complete fictional example to see how a planning question becomes an evidence map, an outline and the next task. Each guide keeps seven prompt variants and its existing workbench tools.
Build an SEO content brief from supplied research, with seven prompts, a complete fictional example, a source map and clear writer acceptance checks.
Plan a research paper with seven prompts, a fictional question-to-evidence example, a source matrix, a research schedule and checks for unsupported claims.